1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mnenie [13.5K]
3 years ago
14

If people believe that separation of powers is important, which of the following would not be a government they support?

History
2 answers:
Anit [1.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a government with legislative, executive, and judicial branches

Explanation:

this type of government is one where the power is distributed among several government bodies, which is a separation of powers.

Angelina_Jolie [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A government where a single ruler, like a king, makes all the decisions

Explanation:

The Separation of Powers principle refers to the division of power and responsibilities of the government into different branches; in the United States, for example, the government has three branches: the judicial, the Executive and the Legislative. This principle, then, opposes to the concentration of power in one body, or a single ruler, like a king, in order to avoid tyranny and corruption. So, people who believe that separation of powers is important, one government they would not support is one where a single ruler, like a king, makes all the decisions.

You might be interested in
Natural born citizen
9966 [12]
A natural born citizen is someone that is born in the country they are living in.

Hope this helps <3
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does prosperity change the wey people live?​
tigry1 [53]

Prosperity can make us greedy sometimes but other times it makes us enjoy our selves a little more.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What is the historical context of this Farewell Address?
zvonat [6]

Answer:

this is the answer

Explanation:

I searched ot

5 0
3 years ago
Where did most of the Civil War Revivals occur?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

a bc trghhreghytrdghhrdggghgyt

4 0
4 years ago
Manifest destiny was realized in the mid-1800s in various ways. With the Oregon territory, it was through negotiation. With the
Iteru [2.4K]

yes, America could still in fact get a large territory. They could get it by force (war), Buy the land, or a treaty. The bigger question however, is it worth doing it. If America wants to get the land by war that just adds to what the're doing in the middle east, and if it's a neighbor next to them (Canada or Mexico) the blood shead could be high because of pupulated cities. As for money or a treaty it wouln't be that much of a risk but it depends on how much money and the details of the treaty.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which type of government would most likely kill those who were deemed enemies of the government?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the best example of a pull factor might cause immigrantion
    10·1 answer
  • Why was a convention convened at Annapolis in 1786? to discuss Shays’s Rebellion in Massachusetts to discuss the Spanish ban on
    15·1 answer
  • After President Nixon’s resignation, who became president of the United States?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the Egyptian achievements do you consider to be the most important
    13·1 answer
  • What roles did Buddhism, Daoism and Neo-Confucianism play in Chinese intellectual life in the period between the Sui dynasty and
    11·1 answer
  • What’s the purpose of te judicial branch
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a type of business organization in a capitalist system
    8·2 answers
  • 1. What are 1 or 2 things that Jefferson did as president that Washington warned against in his
    5·2 answers
  • What is considered the end of the Revolutionary War?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!