1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following was the causes of the english civil war? A. Charles I's persecution of Puritans/ B. Puritans opposed Char

les I taking more power as a monarch/ C. Charles I's rebellion to the Catholic Church
History
2 answers:
tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago
8 0
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. Puritans opposed Charles I taking more power as a monarch."  <span>the cause of the english civil war is that </span>B. Puritans opposed Charles I taking more power as <span>a monarch</span>
just olya [345]3 years ago
5 0

The English Civil War happened between 1642 and 1651. It consisted of a series of armed conflicts and political machinations between Parliamentarians , called "Roundheads", and Royalists, called "Cavaliers". The motive behind it all was mainly the way that England was being governed. Charles dissolved the parliament and made ecclesiastical reforms that alarmed most in England, although he was seen as "too catholic.

The answer is:

B. Puritans opposed Charles I taking more power as a monarch



You might be interested in
The treaty of guadalupe hidalgo provided all of the following except_______?
aliina [53]

The treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo gave the United States some territory <u>south of the Rio Grande</u>

Explanation:

The treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo signed between the United States and Mexico on February 2, 1848, led to a territorial exchange of lands between the two parties.

Mexico had to surrender Texas state and accept the Rio Grande as the boundary of Texas state. This led to half the size of Mexico and increase the size of the United States with a bountiful of rich natural resources.

This increase of vast land tract to the United States included many regions from California to Kansas for which the US paid $15 million.

The Rio Grande is part of the territorial boundary shared by the United States and Mexico.

7 0
3 years ago
Andrew Jackson disliked the _______________of the United States long before he became president.
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

bank. I'm not sure but i think so.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
When a government imposes a fine to coerce citizens to follow a law, which technique of enacting domestic policy is it employing
morpeh [17]
 the government is employing authoritative.
6 0
3 years ago
During construction in the south, poll taxes were used to
Zolol [24]

The poll tax was used in the South during and after Reconstruction as a means of circumventing the 14th Amendment and denying civil rights to blacks.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How can the law of comparative advantage be applied to Country A and Country B? Both countries should produce petroleum and seaf
    11·2 answers
  • A minor can be charged with driving intoxicated if he or she has a bac of
    9·1 answer
  • Which region did not attend Albany Plan of Union?
    10·1 answer
  • Spanish settlers in the Americas eventually relied on _______ to work the cash crops because__________
    5·1 answer
  • 90 points<br> Who were the rulers of Songhai and what made these rulers the most money?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following tended to divide rather than unify the people of ancien greece
    15·1 answer
  • Which answer offers the best explanation for why Tecumseh fought alongside the British in the War of 1812?
    13·1 answer
  • If animals could talk, which would be the rudest?
    14·1 answer
  • How do you think the people of Rome felt about Caesar’s death?
    15·2 answers
  • Match the country with the correct description of a practice used toward slaves.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!