1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Deffense [45]
3 years ago
5

Which country was a member of the Central Powers? Russia Serbia Italy Ottoman Empire

History
1 answer:
nikitadnepr [17]3 years ago
5 0
Ottoman Empire - Plato verified
You might be interested in
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
This is Multiple choice btw
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

it's the first and the last one

Explanation:

cuz I smart

7 0
2 years ago
Jackson saw himself as a man of the people, the Whigs saw Jackson as a power-hungry tyrant. Why did each feel this way? Who do y
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

can you be more specific

8 0
3 years ago
Who owned slaves first?<br> O Africans<br> Australians<br> O Europeans<br> O Native Americans
lora16 [44]

Answer:

african is ur answer

Explanation:

the first person to own slaves was anthony johnson he was a african so ur answer is african

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does modern Europe differ from 17th century Europe
lozanna [386]
Modern Europe is more likley during High Middle AGes decnetralised with open borders and free market wioth limited central fgovernment in 17 century Europe was domianted by absolutist moanrchies centralised often with control over various nations with mercantilistc economic system.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ith which of the following colonial powers did the Native Americans have a mutual-gain relationship?
    8·1 answer
  • The southern colonies were founded for two main reasons: profit and as a barrier against Spain
    9·1 answer
  • What is agent orange
    11·1 answer
  • In 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union over what issue?
    13·1 answer
  • “Were the people” are the first words of the preamble. What do these words mean and how are they reflected in the United states
    10·2 answers
  • Which other country was occupying the Oregon Territory along with the United States
    10·1 answer
  • Which one isn’t true? Please help
    10·1 answer
  • What electoral reform instituted in the 19th century and supported by Progressives led to less party-centered elections?
    7·1 answer
  • According to the Declaration of Independence what right did the British often violate
    15·1 answer
  • The English bill of rights established a
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!