Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The contingency approach of leadership asserts that leadership approach should be given thinking on the natural behavior of the leader and the situation requirement. So, not all good behaviors are good in every situation. So, for this theory, effective leadership depends on adapting the circumstances to the leader's style.
There are six noted types of twelve-step meetings. In "speaker" meetings, one recovering person speaks to the group about his/her addiction and recovery story.
In situations where the open or closed meetings are the mainly utilized, group conscience has assigned the gathering as a speaker meeting. Normally speakers are exchanged between gatherings. These speakers share their "experience, quality and expectation" in relating their landing in a calm life and their pledge to looking after restraint.
Answer:
Keir will have the most money to spend on a new boat at the end of the five years; $1,440
Explanation:
Three friends decide that they each want to be able to buy a new boat in five years. Vanore puts $1,000 in a savings account with a simple interest rate of 4.5%. Keir invests $1,200 in a standard savers account with a simple interest rate of 4%. Omar invests $950 in a junior achievers account with a 6% annual compound interest rate. Who will have the most money to spend on a new boat at the end of the five years?
Vanore puts $1,000 in a savings account with a simple interest rate of 4.5%.
Vanore:
I = p * r * t
= 1000 * 0.045 * 5
= $225
I = $225
After 5 years, Vanore will have $1000 + $225
= $1225
Keir invests $1,200 in a standard savers account with a simple interest rate of 4%
Keir:
I = p * r * t
= 1200 * 0.04 * 5
= 240
I = $240
After 5 years, Keir will have $1200 + $240
= $1,440
Omar invests $950 in a junior achievers account with a 6% annual compound interest rate.
Omar:
A = P (1 + r)^t
= 950(1 +0.06)^5
= 950(1.06)^5
= 950(1.3382)
= 1271.1
A = $1,271.1
After 5 years, Omar will have $1,271.1
Keir will have the most money to spend on a new boat at the end of the five years; $1,440
Answer:
To pay for their armies and other government projects, both empires collected a 25% tax on all agricultural earnings throughout their lands. Class structure was also similar in both empires.
Explanation:
Both empires were governed by a strong central bureaucracy that answered to the emperor. The large territories were further divided into provinces and districts with regional leaders and councils. Local leaders were given a lot of authority in order to streamline decision-making, but the emperors were still the ultimate authority. To pay for their armies and other government projects, both empires collected a 25% tax on all agricultural earnings throughout their lands.
