Based on efficiency, the businesses that should cut hair are the A and C; moreover, to meet the demand, each firm will need to offer at least two haircuts.
The supply of a product or the units of a product that is offered to potential customers should always meet the number of real customers. In the same way, the price of the product should meet the price customers are willing to pay.
In this context, the best is that only firm A and C cut hair, this is because their prices per cut ($25 and $30) match the consumers' willingness to pay this includes Lorenzo ($35), Gilberto ($50), Juanita ($40) and Neha ($25).
- Firm A can cut Neha's and Lorenzo's hair
- Firm C can cut Gilberto's and Juanita's hair
Moreover, this implies each firm needs to do at least 2 haircuts to cover all the possible customers.
In the case of firms B and D, the price per cut is high ($40 - $45). Based on this, they should not cut hair as only a few customers can pay for this service, and this would be inefficient.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13225200
Answer:
156
Explanation:
78
× 2
multiply the 2 by 8 first
then multiply the 7 by 2
Answer:
Pricing can vary for each customer.
Explanation:
Under the B2B, the manufacturer sells its products directly to other businesses such as wholesalers or retailers and not the end consumers.
Hence, pricing can vary for each customer in a business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce purchases because companies that are engaged in B2B are able to improve their performance and cut down the costs of procurement for goods and services.
Business to business (B2B) markets differ from Business to consumers (B2C) markets because salespeople personally call on business customers to a far greater extent than they do consumers.
The Coca-Cola Company sells its products to bottling and canning operations, distributers, fountain wholesalers and some fountain retailers. They then distribute them to retail outlets, corner stores, restaurants, petrol stations and many more.
When I had this question I found the link witch is on the document very helpful.
I hope this helps.
A firm's attempts to shorten the length of time a process takes may lead to disappointing outcomes because of time compression diseconomies.
<h3>
What are time compression diseconomies?</h3>
- According to time compression diseconomies, which are defined as inefficiencies that arise when work is done more quickly, the cost of building a competency will rise exponentially as the amount of time permitted to do so decreases.
- Not every subsidiary deals with time compression diseconomies to the same extent.
- The date of a later subsidiary formation may affect how strong TCD is. Early-established subsidiaries may have greater TCD than later entries due to two factors.
- First, for late movers, vicarious learning may lower TCD. Second, TCD is made worse by the higher environmental uncertainty that early mover subsidiaries frequently experience.
- TCD explains why the well-studied relationship between the level of multi-nationality and business success is negatively moderated by the rate of overseas expansion.
To learn more about Diseconomies refer to:
brainly.com/question/14563017
#SPJ4
