Answer:
Is it really you, if so you know me.
Explanation:
*Questioning life choices*
This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.
FOR
-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights
-People wouldn't voluntarily pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.
-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority
-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest
-corruption
AGAINST
-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?
-wrongfully convicted
apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though
An offer need not be reasonable to be valid is a False statement.
<h3>What are the points to make an offer valid?</h3>
An offer will be considered valid when it will be able to form a legal relationship, which requires that consideration be a two-way process and be done with the intention of getting the consent of the other party.
An offer must be expressed in language that is certain and devoid of all ambiguity to conclude a clear and fair deal. All the terms and conditions of an offer should be clearly communicated.
Therefore the statement is False as to persuade the other side that you are actually making an offer, you must be reasonable.
Learn more about the valid offers, here:
brainly.com/question/17324160
#SPJ1
The Vice President of the United States serves as President of the Senate and may cast the decisive vote in the event of a tie in the Senate. The Senate has the sole power to confirm those of the President's appointments that require consent, and to ratify treaties.
Answer : In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
Explanation: hope that helps
