Answer:
One of the most common criticisms of Stanley Milgram’s studies of obedience is that the results of his experiment do not represent actual tendencies to obey the authority due to the participants of it probably knowing everything was okay, another example is that it has been considered in an unethical study in which he had lied to the respondents.
Explanation:
The correct answer would be, The label has caused her to have lower expectations and apply different treatments
The above mentioned statement is exemplified by the teacher's action.
Explanation:
Intellectual Disability is a disability related to brain functioning. The reasoning, functioning and problem solving are affected directly by this disability.
Children with such disability need more attention at their schools while doing their school tasks. When such students are being labelled as disabled, then the teachers who are teaching that student would have lower expectations from that student and they would definitely have a different treatment with that student than others.
This type of teacher's behavior towards a labeled student can cause more complications.
Learn more about Intellectual Disability at:
brainly.com/question/9220364
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
It offered acres of free land to settlers who were willing to farm.
The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
