1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kicyunya [14]
3 years ago
14

Federalists opposed the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the new U.S. Constitution because of which of the following selections?

Select one: A. they did not believe in individual rights B. they did not believe it was necessary, as many states already had a Bill of Rights C. they preferred to preserve the Articles of Confederation D. it was not a hotly-debated issue at the time
Social Studies
1 answer:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

It can't be A s because they were striving for rights. They definitely didn't want to be powerless again after the tyranny pf the king.

It wouldn't make sense if it were C, because of Shay's Rebellion. They were afraid it would happen again and get more out of control.

it can't be D because it was VERY MUCH discussed. Why else would they write their Federalists Papers?

Your best bet would be B.

You might be interested in
!!!!!!!PLEASE HELP QUICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

c it was the case that started segregation in the united state

6 0
3 years ago
What might a safety hazard include?
Lerok [7]
Read the definition, it will become more clear.
6 0
3 years ago
A written supreme court opinion that disagrees with what the majority of the justices decided is a(n)
ratelena [41]

The answer is concurring opinion. This is considered to be a legal system that is written that are being done by the judges of the court that has an agreement in terms of the decision that is being made or concluded by the court in majority.

6 0
4 years ago
Race entered into a written contract to sell a parcel of land to Lark for $150,000. At the time the agreement was executed, Race
solniwko [45]

Answer:

The contract is voidable at Race's discretion.

Explanation:

The law will recognise the contract as being valid. However, the inebriated state in which Race was in when he signed the contract is of concern here. Since his ability to fully understand and comprehend the terms and nature of the contract was compromised, he has the option to disaffirm or reaffirm the contract in question.

4 0
3 years ago
If a consumer has a homeowners policy would the risk be avoided or shared
-Dominant- [34]

Answer: shared

Explanation: cause the customer gas permission

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some hardships faced by the Danish people because of the war?
    10·1 answer
  • The first American political party to successfully have a president in office
    14·1 answer
  • If you have a telescope that is observing light with wavelengths of a few meters, you are observing __________.
    15·1 answer
  • According to your text, what is the best method to maintain weight gain and manage stress?
    9·1 answer
  • How have electronic media improved the democratic process?
    9·1 answer
  • Demographers are scientists who study
    15·1 answer
  • PLSSS ANWERRR What is a caliphate is in the Islamic faith
    15·1 answer
  • Which European country gained the most land in Africa?
    8·2 answers
  • What may be corrected on a trans birth certificate crossword
    5·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!! In this unit, you learned that the United States has had a two-party political system for much of its history. Alth
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!