You have answered Question #4 correctly. The statement is false.
Nathanson claims that a great benefit of abolishing the death penalty would be that this would send a symbolic message that killing is not acceptable except in self-defense.
Self-defense is a measure to protect one's health and well-being from harm. Many jurisdictions allow the exercise of the right of self-defense as a legal justification for the use of force in times of danger.
To use force to protect oneself from attempts to harm another person. If justified, self-defense is the defense against various crimes and unlawful acts involving violence such as murder, assault, and assault. criminal law.
Whether or not you have a pistol or other personal protective equipment, the goal of self-defense is to survive without injury and escape by deterring or stopping aggressive behavior.
Learn more about self-defense here:brainly.com/question/20714799
#SPJ4
Answer:
Hmm
Explanation:
1)many industries were opened and schools and hospitals plus some colleges opened by great Arab Muslim people.
2)Arab Muslims most of them has their own taste in food and their own spices as their great gran parents were traders. And some foods are not allowed to be eaten as they have some substances which are harmful for the body or you can say they are impure to be eaten.
3)they opened many countries as well as they got freedom from the rule of the Romes and the Byzantines
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
The correct answer is "Pentagon." The Pentagon Papers revealed that few government officials felt the war in Vietnam was winnable. The Pentagon Papers is o<span>fficially titled "Report of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Vietnam Task Force." The Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara commissioned it in 1967. </span>
The grown would be wet and if the river over flowed it would take you house out with it
