In general terms one can think of expansionism, that is occupying land that were deamed not productive in order to cultivate or explore -- onje can check the American expansion to the West, this shows that the settlers had little to no regard to the first settlers.
After the consolidation of the American territory, latinos and native Americans were relegaded as second class citizens, along with ex-slaves, most lations and Afroamericans occupied big centers but mostly in the outskirts, and Native Americans now are over 5 million people, a few more than a half this number live in Alaska alone.
Nowadays there is the problem with the border with Mexico and one can say that there is justified fear of human traficking and smuggling with immigrants who seek a better life in the US, the problem is, there are good people who want to work and prosper in the US but they are blended together with evil-doers, still showing a general suspicion to Latinos as a group.
Prior to the Civil war, the West attracted many immigrants because land was cheap and it was seen as the land of opportunity. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. There were many forested lands and those when cleared can proved good for cultivation.
Conservatives, broadly, do not government intervention in private industry.
They see the Affordable Care Act, not as a necessary fix for a broken healthcare system, but government overreach into a private marketplace in which people can pay the cost of their care or not.
During the Russian Revolution that took place during World War I, the communists successfully removed Csar Nicholas II from power--issuing in several decades of rule by the Soviets.
I don’t know if this is right but I am guessing Britain and France
