The solution would be x > 1 sorry if its wrong but hope it helps
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
a) 1.
Step-by-step explanation:
Supongamos que el primer número entero positivo es a tal que a ∈ Z⁺.
Luego, el conjunto de los cinco enteros positivos se puede expresar como
A = {a; a+1; a+2; a+3; a+4}
Dada la condición del problema, se debe cumplir que
a + (a+1) + (a+2) = (a+3) + (a+4)
⇒ 3a + 3 = 2a + 7
Resolviendo la ecuación resulta
a = 4
Luego, el conjunto A nos resulta
A = {4; 5; 6; 7; 8}
Puede concluirse que sólo un conjunto cumple con esta condición.
Answer:
They hired workers to cross the picket line if a group of workers went on strike.
Step-by-step explanation:
