Answer:
1. What made The Wizard of Oz finally agree to see Dorothy and her friends? (The Scarecrow threatened to call the Winged Monkeys and have them force the Wizard to see them.)
was this answer helpful,?
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
<span>
"O mysterious priest" is how Keats detaches himself from reality and addresses the urn, a piece of art, which is an imaginary character) that he speaks to as if were a human as if the urn was capable of hearing and feelings.
</span>
Answer:
Your question is incomplete, but don't worry, I can be of help.
To be able to match a story to any of this subgenre, you'll have to first understand what they mean.
1. Tragedy: This is a type of drama that ends in sadness, grief, or death, or even all three.
To easily identify tragedy in a narration, you have to ask yourself, did this story end in "happily ever after?" Did it have a good ending? Did the main character die at the end? Did they reach their goal? These are important and useful ways to determine if a narration is tragic.
2. Fantasy: This has to do with supernatural happenings that can only occur in a fantasy world such as dragons, unicorns, talking dogs, etc. When you notice such details, it is most likely that such story is fantasy.
3. Romance: This was made popular by Shakespeare and is a well used subgenre. This can be easily identified if there is love between two or more people who are (usually) opposed by parents or other forces.
Please note that a narration can have more than one of such subgenre.
Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the A. Spanish royal council meeting notes concerning strategies for defeating Muslims.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that, on the one hand, it is said that "European leaders concluded that [...]," and, on the other hand, it is said that "Visionary Europeans hoped to weaken their enemy [...]" Although Sub-Saharan African ivory carvings depicting Muslim merchant caravans and a blueprint of a fast sailing vessel would support the first and second part of the argument, respectively, I believe that the first primary source would most likely support the totality of the argument, since it reflects the opinion of important European leaders—members of the Spanish royal council—concerning strategies for defeating the Muslims, and surely their increasing power, therefore supporting both parts or sections of the argument. Option B does not apply here, since the excerpt is talking about trade in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.