Om Prezi;;;The Knight and The Squire Differences and Similarities Similarities 1) They are family, the knight is the squire's father.
2) The Squire and Knight are both chivalrous and respectful, though the Squire is to a much lesser degree.
3)They are both courteous and humble, too.
4)Both the Knight and the squire are members of the Aristocrat class. Squire 1) A very vivacious, or lively, personality
can be compared to the modern day person, or a prince charming of sorts
2)Twenty year old lustful bachelor
<span>3)Stylish and Daring clothing </span>
(very short gown)
4)Perfectly curled hair
5)Selfish Outlook
6) Supposed to be a knight-in-training.
<span>7)Exaggeration of Falseness </span>
within the Squire Knight 1) Perfect Gentleman
2) Still dressed in undershirt and rust stained mail
3) Believes in the ideals of Chivalry
4) Honest, Truthful, and Faithful
5) Always well mannered
6) Professional Soldier
7) Chaucer gave an exaggeration of perfectness to the Knight dssdasdasfsa Differences 1) The Knight is a warrior, but the squire is more an artist (singing, poetry)
2) The Knight takes his duty very seriously, the squire is just along for the fun.
3)The squire is more concerned with his appearance and social status than the training his father is giving him.
4) Knight has much more experience (proven himself in battle, etc.) but the squire acts like he does not want the experiences. To the best of Chaucer's description, the knight is perfect at not only his job, but as a person also. Chaucer has nonstop praise for the Knight. He believes that the Knight is a profound person.
Chaucer views the Knight with great respect. He admires the Knight, and sees no negative in his personality. Chaucer sees the squire as an amusing and talented person, however also as a very bad squire. The squire is a failure because he is training to be a knight, but never wants to become one.
<span>Chaucer is amused by the squire, and cannot see him becoming a knight, but rather a lover and an artist. Chaucer might not see the squire as a bad person, but without a doubt he is a terrible squire.</span>
This is not answerable as there is no article attached.
The answer is C) <span>his lack of religious toleration caused widespread dissatisfaction with the majority of the population
</span>
Unlike his predecessors who were sensitive in ruling a largely Hindu population, Aurangzeb was seen as a more 'religious' leader who wanted to impose some of his own beliefs on his subjects.
However, in reality many historians actually dispute this. While he did destroy some Hindu temples, the number is often exaggerated and it should be noted that he also destroyed mosques.
<span></span>
Machiavelli believes that <span>the princes can use and should use violence in order to survive or to achieve their aims as rulers, especially when there is a problem in the country ot connected with the country. In such situations the princes should keep the people in fear, so no one would want to attack them or take their power. Otherwise, by providing housing and women, he should keep the peace in the country, In this sense is contradictory how he advises the princes to be more liberal. </span>
It should be both but in equal and balance way that the resources can replenish and used in the future generations. Protecting the resources enables the source to replenish and regain what are lost. Using and extracting enables the society to work and survive. So both are needed to be balanced to work efficiently and effectively.
