All categories

3 years ago

Plss help me asap

Physics

1 answer:

Travka [436]3 years ago

6 0

c. Wind power can turn turbines to generate electrical power.

Explanation:

The correct statement of all is that wind power can turn turbines to generate electrical power.

This is simply the way wind energy from waves are usually harnessed to produce electricity.

When a metallic conductor passes in between magnetic fields, it induces and generates electricity as it turns.
This is how electricity generating plants are fashioned.
Geothermal energy is not generated from moving water. It is produced from heat within the earth brought to the surface. Power from moving water is hydroelectric power.
Oil is a non-renewable resource
Propane is a non-renewable resource

learn more:

Non-renewable resource brainly.com/question/3386515

#learnwithbrainly

You might be interested in

While entering a freeway, a car accelerates from rest at a rate of 2.40 m/s2 for 12.0 s. (a) Draw a sketch of the situation. (b)

ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

a) See attached picture, b) We know the initial velocity = 0, initial position=0, time=12.0s, acceleration= $2.40m/s^{2}$ , c) the car travels 172.8m in those 12 seconds, d) The car's final velocity is 28.8m/s

Explanation:

a) In order to draw a sketch of the situation, I must include the data I know, the data I would like to know and a drawing of the car including the direction of the movement and its acceleration, just like in the attached picture.

b) From the information given by the problem I know:

initial velocity =0

acceleration = $2.40m/s^{2}$

time = 12.0 s

initial position = 0

unknown:

displacement.

in order to choose the appropriate equation, I must take the knowns and the unknown and look for a formula I can use to solve for the unknown. I know the initial velocity, initial position, time, acceleration and I want to find out the displacement. The formula that contains all this data is the following:

$x=x_{0}+V_{x0}t+\frac{1}{2}a_{x}t^{2}$

Once I got the equation I need to find the displacement, I can plug the known values in, like this:

$x=0+0(12s)+\frac{1}{2}(2.40\frac{m}{s^{2}} )(12s)^{2}$

after cancelling the pertinent units, I get that my answer will be given in meters. So I get:

$x=\frac{1}{2} (2.40\frac{m}{s^{2}} )(12s)^{2}$

which solves to:

$x=172.8m$

So the displacement of the car in 12 seconds is 172.8m, which makes sense taking into account that it will be accelerating for 12 seconds and each second its velocity will increase by 2.4m/s.

d) So, like the previous part of the problem, I know the initial position of the car, the time it travels, the initial velocity and its acceleration. Now I also know what its final position is, so we have more than enough information to find this answer out.

I need to find the final velocity, so I need to use an equation that will use some or all of the known data and the unknown. In order to solve this problem, I can use the following equation:

$a=\frac{V_{f}-V_{0} }{t}$

Next, since I need to find the final velocity, I can solve the equation just for that, I can start by multiplying both sides by t so I get:

$at=V_{f}-V_{0}$

and finally I can add $V_{0}$ to both sides so I get:

$V_{f}=at+V_{0}$

and now I can proceed and substitute the known values:

$V_{f}=at+V_{0}$

$V_{f}=(2.40\frac{m}{s^{2}}} (12s)+0$

which solves to:

$V_{f}=28.8m/s$

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If the ball shown in the figure lands in 0.5 s, about what height was it thrown from?

Ede4ka [16]

Answer: 1.22 m

Explanation:

The equation of motion in this situation is:

$y=y_{o}+V_{oy}t-\frac{g}{2}t^{2}$ (1)

Where:

$y=0$ is the final height of the ball

$y_{o}=h$ is the initial height of the ball

$V_{oy}=V_{o}sin(0\°)=0$ is the vertical component of the initial velocity (assuming the ball was thrown vertically and there is no horizontal velocity)

$t=0.5 s$ is the time at which the ball lands

$g=9.8 m/s^{2}$ is the acceleration due gravity

So, with these conditions the equation is rewritten as:

$h=\frac{g}{2}t^{2}$ (2)

$h=\frac{9.8 m/s^{2}}{2}(0.5 s)^{2}$ (3)

Finally:

$h=1.22 m$

4 0

3 years ago

A zero-order reaction has a constant rate of 2.30×10−4 M/s. If after 80.0 seconds the concentration has dropped to 1.50×10−2 M,

dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Initial concentration of the reactant = 3.34 × 10^(-2)M

Explanation:

Rate of reaction = 2.30×10−4 M/s,

Time of reaction = 80s

Final concentration = 1.50×10−2 M

Initial concentration = Rate of reaction × Time of reaction + Final concentration

= 2.30×10−4 M/s × 80s + 1.50×10−2 M = 3.34 × 10^(-2)M

Initial concentration = 3.34 × 10^(-2)M

6 0

2 years ago

The boundary between the crust and mantle is marked by a seismic-velocity discontinuity called

Minchanka [31]

The boundary between the crust and mantle is marked by a seismic-velocity discontinuity is called Mohorovicic discontinuity.

Mohorovicic discontinuity was discovered by Andrija Mohorovicic in 1909 who was a Croatian seismologist. He realized that the velocity of a seismic wave is related to the material's density where it is moving through. He decoded that the acceleration of the seismic waves that are observed within outer shell of the earth is a compositional change. Thus, the acceleration should be caused by a material of higher density.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are chemical processes unable to produce the same amount of energy flowing out of the sun as nuclear fusion?

julsineya [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

One of the major differences between nuclear reactions and chemical reactions is that nuclear reactions involve larger amount of energy than chemical energy. <u>This is because the force between the protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom is much higher than the force of attraction between electrons and the positively charged nucleus, hence nuclear reactions involves/requires a larger amount of energy (because it's reactions involve the nucleus) than chemical reactions (because it's reactions involve the electrons)</u>.

Thus, during nuclear fusion, two light nuclei are bombarded against one another to produce a larger/heavier nuclei with the release of large amount of energy (because the forces between the protons and neutrons are much higher) unlike when two atoms/molecules are chemically combined together to form a new molecule with the rearrangement of electrons in the valence shells of the participating molecules.

3 0

3 years ago