1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
borishaifa [10]
3 years ago
6

Professor Marcos believes that evolution has created many remarkable capabilities that are present even in early infancy, partic

ularly in areas of special importance, such as understanding basic properties of physical objects, plants and animals, and other people. Based on these beliefs, Professor Marcos is likely a(n)____
Social Studies
1 answer:
maw [93]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: <em>Nativist </em>

Explanation:

In discipline such as psychology, nativism tends to refer to the view or notion  that certain or particular abilities or skills are hard-wired or  native into brain at birth. This is further in contrast to the view of empiricism also known as the tabula rasa perspective, which refers to states that brain tends to have endowed with inborn skills for learning from its surroundings or environment .

You might be interested in
IM STUCK CAN YOU GUYS HELP ME AGAIN
Helen [10]

Answer:

lol

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
100 points help, super easy
goldenfox [79]

Answer: paragraph 3.

Explanation: It says the Alamo used to be a church and a military base.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is sugaulitrety when was sugauli trirty establist
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

Sugauli treaty was a treaty that defined the borders of Nepal after its expansion to other territories and conflicts with other countries aroused. It was established on the 2nd of December 1815.

Explanation:

The Sugauli treaty established the borders of Nepal after conflicts with the East India Company took place. Nepal and the East India Company signed a treaty that defined the limits of Nepal. As a consequence, Nepal lost some of its territories. The Sugauly treaty was signed on December 2, 1815, and ratified on March 4, 1816.

4 0
2 years ago
Which option describes what happened at a potlatch? (1 point)
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
Potlatch, ceremonial distribution of property and gifts to affirm or reaffirm social status, as uniquely institutionalized by the American Indians of the Northwest Pacific coast. The potlatch reached its most elaborate development among the southern Kwakiutl from 1849 to 1925. Although each group had its characteristic version, the potlatch had certain general features. Ceremonial formalities were observed in inviting guests, in speechmaking, and in the distribution of goods by the donor according to the social rank of the recipients. The size of the gatherings reflected the rank of the donor. Great feasts and generous hospitality accompanied the potlatch, and the efforts of the kin group of the host were exerted to maximize the generosity. The proceedings gave wide publicity to the social status of donor and recipients because there were many witnesses.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the actions of the other co
Afina-wow [57]

This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:

Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:

the mere exposure effect.

the just-world phenomenon.

mirror-image perceptions.

deindividuation.

social facilitation.

None of the listed answers are correct

Answer:

This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.

Explanation:

The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did United States became part of First World War?
    13·2 answers
  • Yolanda is 24; Zachary is 44; Andrew is 73. Assume that each successfully completes the identity crisis associated with his or h
    5·1 answer
  • Make a chart comparing the requirements for the Georgia House to the Georgia Senate. Which one is more stringent? Justify your a
    12·1 answer
  • A purpose of the Indian boarding schools was_
    13·1 answer
  • The Soviet Union claimed that its expansionism after World War II was an attempt to protect itself from future
    6·2 answers
  • "federal system maintains close relationship between government and the people ".Justify the statement in a paragraph.​
    5·2 answers
  • Plzzzz help meee!!!!!!!!!
    15·2 answers
  • Driving skills are a basic qualification of
    6·1 answer
  • How can stereotyping influence your career and study choice
    11·1 answer
  • The broad principles underlying American political culture that most Americans support and adhere to are known as
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!