Which conclusion can be drawn about the second punic war from the information in the map

History

1 answer:

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The Second Punic War was fought between the Romans and the Carthaginians between 218 and 201 BC. The Romans then went on to a several-year war of wear and tear, gradually destroying or neutralizing the allies and main colonies of Carthage, and finally, under the leadership of Publius Cornelius Scipionus Africano, they won the Battle of Zama. This war definitely decided the struggle of both cities for dominance in the Mediterranean in favor of Rome.

Due to the complete destruction of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BC and the long-term hegemony of the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean, no historical sources have been preserved describing the course of the war and its background from a Carthaginian or truly neutral point of view. Historians can therefore rely only on the works of Greek and Roman ancient authors and must therefore interpret them very carefully.

You might be interested in

Write a report analyzing a President or issue of your choice related to American involvement in World War I

k0ka [10]

Answer:

rsy-feiu-xad j0in only girlś

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A common trait shared by many developing nations is that they. A) have less developed infrastructure. B) are all located in Lati

cestrela7 [59]

A common trait shared by many developing nations is that they have less developed infrastructure. In most cases, their infrastructures are possibly failing, insufficient or non-existent. Inadequate infrastructure could be a barrier to economic growth.

The answer would be letter A.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

11. In Peppermint Patty's letter home to her grandmother, what does she

Igoryamba

Answer:

“Be strong and courageous. Do not fear or be in dread of them, for it is the LORD your God who goes with you. He will not leave you or forsake you.” [Deuteronomy 31:6]

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What did you learn from the reading about Charlemagne’s life and character that supports the idea that his leadership led to a s

ZanzabumX [31]

He grew up in a largely Christian family and the Catholics were powerful and controlling so he wanted to be part of that autocracy

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best summarizes the attitude of the majority of Americans toward the war in Europe when the war first broke out?

Papessa [141]

Answer: B is correct.

Explanation: there were many who wanted to follow isolationism arguing that the war was problem of Europeans, there were also those (many Americans were of European origin with their roots in different corners of the Old continent). Situation changed and USA (country of European origin and roots) entered the war and continued engaged in (especially) European security policy.

3 0

3 years ago