Answer:
Explanation:
to gain a political advantage
Risky behavior can lead to:
- decrease in self-esteem given all the aspects of risky behavior that a person may engage in. eg. drugs
-- emotional distress> use this definition to guide you to our answer : emotional distress - Legal Definition. n. A negative emotional reaction—which may include fear, anger, anxiety, and suffering—endured/experienced by the victim of a tort, for which monetary damages may be awarded.
- Internal anger :risky behaviour may lead to a build up of internal anger as in gives the persin engaging in this behaviour a sense of adrenaline and in some way may be emotionally addictive. If a person continues to engage in risky behaviour their violent instincts could become unleashed without them even realising it causing them to have a build up of anger within which in turn can most definitely effect their lifestyle choices.
- decrease in self esteem
- an addiction to it so when life is normal they'll feel grumpier, sad, angst, ect.
- loneliness
- apathy
In 1918 H1N1 Or "The Spanish Flu" emerged and was extremely contagious. It was a Novel Virus just as SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus) is. Within months H1N1 spread to almost every country on the planet and was considered a Pandemic. The reason it was called "The Spanish Flu" is because Spain was the only country to report this in their news media. similar to what china tried to do by not reporting about the virus at first. The reason the 1918 was so deadly was because it emerged right as World War 1 ended and soldiers where moving all across the planet to return from the war to their home country which made the virus spread like wildfire and now with SARS-CoV-2 millions of people travel to the other side of the planet within hours daily which made it spread so fast.
Ida B. Wells was a firm believer that many of the tactics used by whites against blacks, such as violent intimidation and lynching, was used purely to keep the black population from advancing socially and economically, and therefore advocated heavily for black and women suffrage in the hopes of eventually being able to change the laws.
It’s Gibsons v Ogden: Defending Congress’ power under the commerce clause
