1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
3 years ago
13

Do all people who migrate move because of natural disasters? True or False

Social Studies
1 answer:
Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is False

Explanation:

This simply isn't true at all for a few reasons. People migrate for many reasons whether it be for a job, a better life, or escaping a corrupt government.

We can see many examples throughout history of migration due to other factors such as puritans sailing to the americas to avoid religious prosecution from their home in the British isles.

You might be interested in
Dinesh takes a look through his office desk and makes a mental note of the supplies he needs to replenish. On the way to the sup
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

The correct answer is the Primacy effect.

Explanation:

The primacy effect is part of the memory in some individuals in which the person takes a list of things to remember, but only grasps the first items in the list and the things that are in the middle or at the end are forgotten.  This is the contrary of the recency effect in which the individual only remembers the last items.

5 0
3 years ago
In the atom, the __________ occupies most of its mass, while the __________ occupies most of its volume
lord [1]
<span>Nucleus in the first one, 
Electron Cloud second one</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Describe the two ways Lewis argues that the moral law is not simply a social convention. Some things we learn in school are good
ddd [48]

Answer:

C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."

Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."

Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would playing a game of soccer, baseball, or basketball be different if inertia didn’t exist?
amid [387]
No one would be able to stop moving, and the ball wouldn't stop moving.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Most 4-year-olds respond that there is more apple juice in the tall, thin glass than there was in the short, broad one. In fact,
svp [43]

Answer:

This is an example of conservation.

Explanation:

Conservation is one of Jean Piaget's developmental accomplishments, in which a child understands that changing the form of a substance or object does not change its amount, volume, or mass. This is typically accomplished between the operational stage of development around ages 7 to 11. Therefore, it is typical for 4-year-olds to not be able to comprehend the concept of conservation.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Parents warn a new babysitter that their son, Dennis, is very aggressive and mischievous. As a result of this initial expectatio
    7·1 answer
  • What was the leading cause of the Pullman Strike?
    6·1 answer
  • The NBAC looks at characteristics individuals might have that would prevent them from being able to provide voluntary informed c
    6·2 answers
  • A social norm that reflects how things are typically done is considered ________, whereas a social norm that reflects what behav
    12·1 answer
  • A researcher studying small-town religiosity in the United States randomly selected 10 states. From these states, he randomly se
    14·1 answer
  • Tonya was astonished when she flipped a coin 10 times and it came up heads each time. She believed that this was her lucky day a
    9·1 answer
  • The "free exercise clause" of the First Amendment is intended to
    5·2 answers
  • What is the correct meaning of the word method?
    11·1 answer
  • The economy of the Middle
    14·1 answer
  • Is the term used to describe the amount of control or influence that consumers have on a market.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!