Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
Sumner was physically attacked by Brooks in Congress because "<span>d. Sumner challenged the Fugitive Slave Act and angered pro-slavery supporters" since he was an avid abolitionist. </span>
Answer:
Puritans, History of Plymouth plantation .
Explanation:
She is <span>B. Mama Quilla
</span>
The event that resulted in the creation of NASA would be when the Russian's first launched the Sputnik into space and JFK told America that we will be the first on the moon and that we will not let the Russian's win this race. Which hence why we called it the space race.
