2 years ago

The United Nations had a more successful start than the League of Nations. True False

2 answers:

ivann1987 [24]2 years ago

8 0

The United Nations did indeed have a more successful start that the League of Nations so the answer your are looking for is True

Alborosie2 years ago

6 0

Yes they were more successful because the league had no procedure of forcefully enforcing their rules. This is the reason Hitler was able to invade so many countries without any interference. The UN has many procedures in dealing with that kind of thing such as an army that belongs to the UN as well as investigation units.

You might be interested in

The invention of the internet is an example of how

Aleks [24]

Answer:

world change from analogy to morden

7 0

3 years ago

Who was Camillo de Cavour and otto Bismarck?

Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

camillo was an italian statesman and leading figure in the movement toward italian unification. otto was the prince of bismarck and a conservative german statesman who masterminded the unification of germany and served as its first chancellor until 1890

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Kantótan tayo hehe ugh

dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

Please explain it in English so that i can understand

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Where did John Adams go in 1779