Answer: B: "The information age"
Explanation: "The information age" began in the 20th Century, let us say started around the 1970s. The information age is also called the 'digital age', or 'computer age' which adopts the use of digital computers and digital record keeping processes.
It is a shift from the industrial revolution and is based upon access to 'information technology' where people can easily access 'information' and 'knowledge', thereby making information and knowledge easily disseminated and available.
Answer:
Opechancanough
Cause of death-Shot in the back while a prisoner
Resting place-Pamunkey Reservation King William, Virginia, U.S.
Relatives Chief Powhatan (brother) Pocahontas (niece) John Rolfe (nephew-in-law)
Military service
/hope this helps/
Answer:
South America's predominant democratic regimes and its increasing interdependence on regional trade have not precluded the emergence of militarized crises between Colombia and Venezuela or the revival of boundary claims between Chile and Peru. This way, how can we characterize a zone that, in spite of its flourishing democracy and dense economic ties, remain involved in territorial disputes for whose resolution the use of force has not yet been discarded? This article contends that existing classifications of zones of peace are not adequate to explain this unusual coexistence. Thus, its main purpose is to develop a new analytical category of regional peace for assessing this phenomenon: the hybrid peace. It aims to research the evolution of security systems in South America during the previous century and build a new, threefold classification of peace zones: negative peace zones, hybrid peace zones, and positive peace zones.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest
a. In the prisoners' dilemma game self-interest leads each prisoner to confess. to a breakdown of any agreement that the prisoners might have made before being questioned to an outcome that is not particularly good for either prisoner.
What is prisoners' dilemma game?
The prisoner's dilemma is a common illustration of a game explored in game theory that demonstrates why two logical people could disagree even though it seems to be in their best interests to collaborate.
The possible outcomes:
- If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves two years in prison
- If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve three years in prison
- If A remains silent but B betrays A, A will serve three years in prison and B will be set free
- If A and B both remain silent, both of them will serve one year in prison (on the lesser charge).
Learn more about prisoners' dilemma here:
brainly.com/question/22597804
#SPJ4
The US would impose a retaliatory tariff against another country if they were to attack US shipping during a time of war where the US was a neutral party or if the said country did something major violating a common right or disrespectful to the US as a whole and we would use the tariff to try to force them to fix the issue.
