1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
14

Was the United States justified in the dropping of the atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

History
1 answer:
satela [25.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I believe that the United States was and wasn't justified to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Explanation:

It was justified because Japan realized a surprise attack at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, after two hours of bombing, 18 U.S. ships were sunk or damaged, 188 U.S. aircraft were destroyed, and 2,403 people were killed, all of this happened while the U.S. and Japan were officially engaging in diplomatic negotiations for possible peace in Asia.

It wasn't justified because the two bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people.

You might be interested in
Hiiiiiii helppp me in this especially number 3 .Rewrite it to make it true if false and if true just write true.
kiruha [24]
The correct answer for 1 is false. After the French defeat, the lands became British and Britain imposed new rules on how to deal with Natives. These rules were not friendly and the Native Americans were highly dissatisfied because the French were often friendly to the Natives and worked together with them

The correct answer for 2 is true. The land where the Natives lived belonged to France. Frenchmen didn't bother them and kept the relations positive. When France lost and Britain got the  territories, British soldiers inhabited the land and started bothering the locals which rose tensions.

The correct answer for 3 is false. The Native American tribes that worked together failed to kick out the British armies from the lands. However, they did compel them to change their policies regarding trade and behavior on the lands which means that it was a sort of a stale mate.

The correct answer for 4 is true. The proclamation forbade the colonists from going westwards. This caused a lot of anger because they wanted to spread more westwards since they wanted more land for themselves. This proclamation was important because it established borders for living in the colonies.

The correct answer for 5 is false. The colonists were unhappy. They wanted to go more westwards and get new land and establish new colonies. They believed that the king had no right to restrict their movement since it was forbidden by law to go westwards.
3 0
4 years ago
Why did American Indians who lived in dry areas make knives from flint rather than slate?
olganol [36]
<span>Slate was more common in wet microclimates.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
ASAP PLEASE :( Define in your own words the meaning of the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. *
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase gives three examples of the "unalienable rights" which the Declaration says have been given to all human beings by their Creator, and which governments are created to protect. These rights apply to ideals or issues that are important in today’s world because they talk about life and happiness which every person in this world has.

I hope this helped.

3 0
3 years ago
What tactic did Filipino insurgents use to undermine American power
ehidna [41]
One of the tactics that Filipino insurgents used to undermine American power was "guerrilla warfare" mostly due to the fact that the Filipinos knew the land and territory far better than the Americans. 
5 0
3 years ago
What is mootness, and how is it different from ripeness?
Andrej [43]
Mootness seeks to prevent the plaintiff to assert the claim too late when the plaintiff has no longer a personal stake in the outcome because change of circumstances. Ripeness arises when a plaintiff suit is premature because the plaintiff's injury has not yet occurred, it is speculative or may never occur.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe conditions at Bosque Redondo.
    12·1 answer
  • What experiences did Cabeza de Vaca have?
    11·1 answer
  • The sculpture of the ancient egyptians expresses strength and _______.
    15·2 answers
  • Who became the president of Texas after the region became independent from Mexico?
    9·1 answer
  • Executive Order 9066 was the order that____________________.
    11·1 answer
  • Which choice would be considered a nation?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the supreme court decision in worcester v. georgia and the indian removal act lead the removal and resettlement of nativ
    15·1 answer
  • __________ refers to the average number of people that live within a specific unit in an area/region.
    9·1 answer
  • How did communication cause the roman empire to fall
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the sentences is written in active voice?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!