The brinkmanship enables the country to manage a strong position without engaging itself in the conflict.
<h3>What is brinkmanship?</h3>
The brinkmanship has been the political policy and the condition that enables the county or the group to use a dangerous event in order to bring forward advantageous results.
The country that has been following the brinkmanship practice will be using the position of strength without being involved in the conflict. Thus, option A is correct.
Learn more about brinkmanship, here:
brainly.com/question/2791581
One
Your first instinct is probably to choose the free response essay. If you did, you would not be correct. A free response starts out with you making an opinion statement, but you have to be able to back it up, and your reasons ought to be logical.
DBQ you be your next guess, because the letters aren't well known and maybe it doesn't require any back up. Unfortunately it does. DBQ stands for Document Based Questions. That means you have to check things very carefully.
Globally Thinking Essay requires that you pick a global issue that you could apply to something local.
A process essay is what its name suggests. You are writing a procedure to do something. I don't think you need any backup material for this. You just have to give the right steps to do something. A document won't help you.
In my day this would not depend on any background notations if you were good enough. Simply writing an interpretation would be good enough. I don't think that's true now.
These terms are all knew to me but I would go with the process essay. It is cut and dried and I don't think it requires documentation, not at the level I'm thinking of. A scholarly paper might require great care in the directions for the procedure.
I'd pick D.
Two
A thesis statement should start out to be very general and then it should be confined in some way. Statements E (especially), D, C and B are too specific to start with. The true statement and general one is likely A.
Three
The definition of Histiography is the study of the way history is written. The first thing you say about any study should be what and not how. What is histiography? is the first thing you have to deal with. Top Down and Bottom up are methods of looking at history. Both are valid depending on what you are writing about. As usual I don't think any of them are really a choice or they all are. A is your best choice in my mind, but that's a poor choice of a bad lot.
The problem with the answers is that they suggest change. That's not what Histiography is is about. It is just the study of how history is written. For example Top Down is about the leaders who have created history and bottom up is how people have lived under that rule. There is no mention of one being superior to another or that we need to revise anything.
<h2>A country with a Confederal system has week type of central government.</h2>
Explanation:
The transformation of united States from an assorted group of colonies to a successful independent nation was a great history. As the colonies grew, the people of colonies hated to be treated as the children of Great Britain.
They mostly focused on avoiding the abuses that they received by an overly-powerful government and started the constitution called the Articles of Confederation.
After the Revolutionary War, the league of friends immediately became a league of impoverished quibblers. It was not powerful enough to solve the economic and financial crises issues facing a new nation.
In 1381 CE peasants led by Jack Straw marched on London and petitioned the government to abolish the high taxes that they argued were hurting the "common people" such as farmers.
