Solve the following system using elimination:
{-2 x + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{-2 x - y + z = -3 | (equation 2)
{2 x + 3 y + 3 z = 5 | (equation 3)
Subtract equation 1 from equation 2:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x - 3 y - 2 z = -3 | (equation 2)
{2 x + 3 y + 3 z = 5 | (equation 3)
Multiply equation 2 by -1:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+3 y + 2 z = 3 | (equation 2)
{2 x + 3 y + 3 z = 5 | (equation 3)
Add equation 1 to equation 3:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+3 y + 2 z = 3 | (equation 2)
{0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 3)
Swap equation 2 with equation 3:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)
{0 x+3 y + 2 z = 3 | (equation 3)
Subtract 3/5 × (equation 2) from equation 3:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y - (8 z)/5 = 0 | (equation 3)
Multiply equation 3 by 5/8:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y - z = 0 | (equation 3)
Multiply equation 3 by -1:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)
Subtract 6 × (equation 3) from equation 2:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+5 y+0 z = 5 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)
Divide equation 2 by 5:
{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)
{0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)
Subtract 2 × (equation 2) from equation 1:
{-(2 x) + 0 y+3 z = -2 | (equation 1)
{0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)
v0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)
Subtract 3 × (equation 3) from equation 1:
{-(2 x)+0 y+0 z = -2 | (equation 1)
{0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)
Divide equation 1 by -2:
{x+0 y+0 z = 1 | (equation 1)
{0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)
{0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)
Collect results:
Answer: {x = 1, y = 1, z = 0
Answer: bruh nobody needs to know this I won’t use this irl
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Since 95% confidence interval contains 0 we conclude at 95% confidence level that the two means are equal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in a fast food study a researcher finds that mean sodium content of 32 Wendy's fish sandwiches is 1080 milligrams with a standard deviation of 75 milligrams. The mean sodium content of 39 Long John Silver's fish sandwiches is 1120 milligrams with a standard deviation of 100 milligrams
H0: The two means are equal
Ha: The two means are not equal
(Two tailed test at 5% level)
Variable A Variable B
Mean 1080.00 1120.00
SD 75.00 100.00
SEM 13.26 16.01
N 32 39
95% CI: -82.65 to 2.65
Since 95% confidence interval contains 0 we conclude at 95% confidence level that the two means are equal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Fraction = 280% / 100%
= 280/100 = 14/5 or 2 4/5.
Answer:
Option A is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we see the graph, we can say that the correct statement is :
A.)All repairs requiring 1 hour or less have the same labor cost. We can see that the coat from 0 hours to 1 hour is $50. So, the number of hours falling in this range has the same repairing cost.
B.) Labor costs the same no matter how many hours are used for a repair. This is wrong as the graph is increasing after 1 hour.
C.) Labor costs for a repair are more expensive as the number of hours increases. This is wrong as the hours are increasing from 0.25 to 0.5 then to 0.75 but they all have the same cost.
D.)There is no cost of labor for a repair requiring less than 1 hour. This is also wrong. The cost is $50.
