Is 3/2 the opposite of 6/4 on a number line? Please I’m so bad at this
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Since we know that the graph of our quadratic function has x-intercepts at (6,0) and (18,0), 
and 
are the zeroes of our quadratic. To find our quadratic we are going to factor each zero backwards and multiply them:
Now that we have our quadratic function, we are going to use the average formula:
is the function evaluated at the <span>9th month
</span>
is the function evaluated at the 3rd month
![m= \frac{[9^{2}-24(9)+108]-[3^{2}-24(3)+108]}{9-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5B9%5E%7B2%7D-24%289%29%2B108%5D-%5B3%5E%7B2%7D-24%283%29%2B108%5D%7D%7B9-3%7D%20)
We can conclude that the closest approximate average rate of change for Edna's profits from the 3rd month to the 9th month is: <span>B. −11.63 dollars per month.</span>
Now that we have our quadratic function, we are going to use the average formula:
</span>
We can conclude that the closest approximate average rate of change for Edna's profits from the 3rd month to the 9th month is: <span>B. −11.63 dollars per month.</span>
Answer:
multiply input number by 4
Step-by-step explanation:
In the figure attached, the problem is shown.
We can see the following values:
input = 1, output = 4*1 = 4
input = 4, output = 4*4 = 16
input = 7, output = 4*7 = 28
Then, the missing numbers can be found multiply input number by 4
