With the increase or decrease of the prices of substitutes, the demand of the substitute goods also decreases or increases.
Explanation:
Substitutes are the products which can be used in place of another product. For example, a cup of coffee can be taken instead of a cup of tea, or Coke can be taken instead of Pepsi.
Change in the price of Substitutes can affect the demand of other substitutes. If the price of a product increases, then the demand of its substitute increases, and if the price of the product decreases, then the demand of its substitute also decreases.
We can understand this relation with an example. Suppose the product is tea. The substitute of tea is coffee. If the price of tea increases, then people will definitely move towards the substitute, which is coffee. This will increase the demand for coffee. Similarly, if the price of tea decreases, people will buy more tea than coffee, which will decrease the demand for coffee. This is how the substitutes affect demand of each other.
Learn more about substitutes at:
brainly.com/question/12566919
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
D.) Once the Supreme Court determines a law to be unconstitutional, there is no way for it to be passed.
Explanation:
This is a substituting function when a child is confronted in front of his parents about stealing cookies from Jar.
<h3>What is Substituting Function in Non-Verbal Communication?</h3>
Substituting function is a replacement of verbal communication. The main role played by body structure in substituting function is Substituting is a part of non-verbal communication.
Thus, the given statement is a perfect example of the substituting function of non-verbal communication where the child is confronted by his body language in front of a parent when he steals the cookies.
Learn more about Non-verbal communication here:
brainly.com/question/23308812
#SPJ1
what's the question your asking?
Answer:
State
Explanation:
According to Max Weber's theory, the state is considered to be the liable authority to control or have possession of the violence within the boundary of the territory. The main source of the monopoly of violence in the state is police and military, the state has also the right to use private security until the motive behind initiating violence is fulfilled.
