1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
4 years ago
7

In this activity, you will discuss the relationship between the scientific revolution and the Enlightenment. Would the Enlighten

ment have been possible if the scientific revolution had not occurred first?
History
2 answers:
ale4655 [162]4 years ago
6 0

Theoretically, it would seem that the Enlightenment would not have been possible without the Scientific Revolution (or something like it) happening first.  Or perhaps two movements like those could have occurred simultaneously.  In any case, they are certainly closely related.

The Scientific Revolution questioned superstition and traditional beliefs that had not been investigated.  The Enlightenment championed this approach to knowledge, emphasizing the use of reason in all matters, in contrast to following superstition or unquestioningly accepting traditional beliefs.  

The Scientific Revolution showed that there are natural laws in place in the physical world and in the universe at large.  Applying similar principles to matters like government and society, Enlightenment thinkers believed that using reason will guide us to the best ways to operate politically so we can create the most beneficial conditions for society.  For many Enlightenment thinkers, this included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved.    This led to changes of approach to how society should be governed -- moving away from ideas like the "divine right of kings" to the establishment of more democratic, constitutional societies.

Stolb23 [73]4 years ago
3 0

The Scientific Revolution was one of the factors that caused the Enlightenment. However, it depends on which entities of the Enlightenment you are focusing on.

When we think of the Enlightenment, we tend to think of philosophers first. This is because the Enlightenment was not a purely scientific movement, but more of a wide-ranged intellectual time. Ideas from thinkers like Galileo, Copernicus, Isaac Newton, etc, were produced in the Scientific Revolution, and merely built off of in the Enlightenment.

You see, thinkers during the Enlightenment wanted to question the many beliefs that were set during the Dark Ages, which also meant going up against large, powerful opposition, like the Catholic Church. The ideas that came out of the Scientific Revolution gave Enlightenment thinkers the facts they would use when creating their theories. Armed with these facts, they could debunk the ridiculous theories that others had set in the past.

So finally, to answer your question, it is probable that the Enlightenment would have started nevertheless, but it is unlikely that the ideas of its thinkers would have made such an impact without the Scientific Revolution.

Hope it helps!

You might be interested in
Why would the Sons of Liberty be a secret organization?
dusya [7]
The group was made up of a bunch of former criminals but they didnt want to be recognized (please mark me brainliest to help me rank up)
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did hitler invade poland?
Rus_ich [418]
Well you see <span>during the time </span>Hitler<span> was gaining power, Britain and France basically just kept ignoring all Germany's invasions etc. but after allowing </span>Hitler<span> to </span>invade<span> other countries they basically told him that if he </span>invaded poland<span>they would declare war on Germany.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
the supreme court decisions inn the griswold v. connecticut and roe v. wade were based on principle of the right to
Scrat [10]

The Supreme Court decisions in Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade were based on the principle of the right to free speech.


5 0
3 years ago
_ was convicted of "corrupting the youth of athens and sentenced to death in 399 b.c.
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death. He chose poison as his method of death.

3 0
4 years ago
HELP ME OUT PLEASE!
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

Mercantilism was a popular economic philosophy in the 17th and 18th centuries. In this system, the British colonies were money makers for the mother country. The British put restrictions on how their colonies spent their money so that they could control their economies.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The animist religions which are widespread throughout africa share a belief in
    11·1 answer
  • Immigrants coming to America from eastern and Southern Europe during the late 19th century were most likely to
    7·2 answers
  • How did industrialism help countries to take control of other countries?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the english coloct taxes from the colonists
    12·2 answers
  • 01:
    6·2 answers
  • Why is the Indus Valley Civilisation named so ? help pliz now i will give 50 point ​
    6·1 answer
  • Why are third party important in a political system?
    12·2 answers
  • How were Native Americans impacted by the Revolutionary War?<br><br> Help!!
    8·1 answer
  • The Republican Party of the 1850's...
    6·1 answer
  • What characterized the energy and activism of the 1960s? What happened to the idealism of the 1960s?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!