To Ratify a constitution means

History

1 answer:

Andrew [12]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

C. To agree and aprove

Explanation:

Ratify means to sign or give formal consent to (a treaty, contract, or agreement), making it officially valid.

You might be interested in

Explain the difference between President Truman's and Eisenhower's strategies to win or end the

Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Truman and Eisenhower were anti-communist and extremely militant but their strategies were opposite to each other.

Explanation:

Both Truman and Eisenhower were anti-communist and extremely militant. However, Truman has more Alliency then Eisenhow. Truman created Organisation of American States (OAS) in 1948 laying down the hemispheres military strategy of defence. He increased the defence expenditure and also created North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949 as response to Stalin's blockade. He opposed the nuclear weapon idea

While Eisenhower focussed on slashing the budget thereby promoting More Military and less tresry. His spending led to mass inflation and created New look plan that rely on bombs for warfare

8 0

3 years ago

A. The Chesapeake and New England regions had many differences in development, but they also had similarities.

Kisachek [45]

A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is B. The Chesapeake and New England colonies developed into two distinct societies based on their geography, reasons for founding, economic characteristics, and relationships with American Indians.

You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.

The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:

New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.

Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.

We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.

Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.

3 0

2 years ago

What recent event triggered renewed fighting within sri lanka? select one:

Salsk061 [2.6K]

A would be the most correct answer. The 2004 tsunami caused untold damage and destruction to the Sri Lankan island and to its inhabitants. This led to more fighting over the sparse resources that were left over by the islanders who were still alive.

6 0

3 years ago

How are the chesapeake and new england coloinies different politically?

ozzi

Social,Economic and Political Differences Between the New England and Chesapeake Colonies. Nations quickly colonized the New World years after Columbus so called discovery. England in particular sent out a number of groups to the east coast of the New World to two regions.

5 0

3 years ago

Tracing the Spread of Human Beings

True [87]

The most acceptable theory about how humans came to populate Earth is that they migrated over land from Africa over the last 80,000 years.

<h3>What was the widely accepted human origin? </h3>

It was accepted that Africa is where the modern humans began over thousands of years from which they spread across the world.

It was believed that different environments needed different appearance and behavior and this led to ab enormous variety among human populations of the Earth.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.