Question Options:
A. attractive
B. competent-looking
C. homely
D. baby-faced
Answer: COMPETENT LOOKING
Explanation: Competent looking refers to the tendency for an individual to "look" like they have sufficient skill, knowledge, ability, or qualifications to perform a job.
As against the other options, the Participants preferred Competent looking candidate because they believe they are capable of doing the job effectively.
Answer:The public forum doctrine
Explanation:The public forum doctrine is a tool used in First Amendment jurisprudence which is used as a constitution that define speech restrictions but it also gives permission to a group to have a rally in a particular property or engage in whatever activity in a particular property.
Traditional Public Forums
- These forums includes public parks , sidewalks and areas that are open for political speech and debate , these are the areas in which people get protected under the First Amendment protection. The government under the public forum doctrine is accepted not to discriminate against any speakers irrespective of their views but should provide protection with only stipulated restricted in their speech.
Yes, i believe it was.
<span> the agency should have allowed him to present evidence which stated that he did not know the statements he made on his application were false.
</span>Manin could avoid the accusation by claiming that he would've provided the necessary information about his convictions, if only the<span> national transportation safety board mentioned it in the requirement.</span>
The purpose of these both steps is that it gives the candidates a realistic, sensible, and practical preview of the vacant job. In both steps, candidates of the hiring process should know the job expectation versus reality so they will not be surprised if their expectation doesn't meet.
This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
