Answer:
counter-conditioning
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this development is due to counter-conditioning. This term, also referred to as stimulus substitution, is when an individual associates a positive stimulus to an unwanted behavior or response that would otherwise not be associated with. Which is what Johnny has done by associating the lights to the dentist's office which he hates.
Answer:
Face is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Following are the difference between capitalism and socialism:
Explanation:
Capitalism:
It is an economic framework, that maintains personal or company ownership of the production, distribution, and funds activity through profit.
It is also considered as an economic framework wherein the private entities possess assets, that are controlled by the property to satisfy the needs or production and consumption independently set the prices for markets so, that it can serve society's best needs.
Socialism:
It is a system of economics and politics, in which the voluntary institution's economic ideology. It assumes that employees must control the process of creating, starting to move as well as the payment period.
It includes money, which produced falls instead of the group of private individuals to the people who make the products.
Answer:
The answer is
→ <u><em>Phatic communication</em></u>
Explanation:
Phatic communication is a type of communication that lay out a disposition of amiability rather than to convey significant data or thoughts.
Therefore, <u><em>phatic communication</em></u> is your answer!
Hope this helped! :^)
<span>Chomsky would attribute Susan's quick acquisition of grammatical rules to her </span>"language acquisition device".
The language acquisition device is a speculative instrument in the mind that helps youngsters rapidly learn and comprehend dialect. Noam Chomsky presented the theory that the LAD represent the quick speed at which kids appear to learn dialect and its rules. Later advanced into Chomsky's more prominent hypothesis of universal grammar.
