Judicial activism is the act of passing ruling in a court not according to the law, but to personal beliefs and preferences. The opposite of judicial activism is judicial restraint, in which the judges follow the constitution exactly and abstain from passing ruling not specified in the constitution.
An idiot would tell you that robots would take over the world. I honestly believe we as humans have the ability to make sure we don't go that far.
People, especially most Americans, have a borderline fetish for leisure. If it makes things easy, buy it, buy it, buy it now. Likely, more advancements will be made to make sure people won't have to leave their home via conventional ways to go to work. Basically, we get even more lazy than we already are, all things considered. Not to mention new innovations for war.
Some good can come from this, however. We require an alternative to fossil fuels, so green energy will be a must in the future. Advancements in medicine will thrive, after everyone discovers that there really are cures for almost anything (there's just no money for the doctors in curing the disease, only treating it). A cleaner Earth, a better planet, a better ecosystem.
Answer:-You are sending a past-due notice on an account.
-You want to schedule a meeting to update your boss on a client meeting.
-You need to fire your receptionist.
Explanation:
What is an indirect strategy?
This is a strategy that you can use to convey news without coming face to face with the receiver sometimes it helps to save time or if the news are not going to be good for the receiver.
A written message can be better to do that to actual approach an uncomfortable situation which will be difficult for you and the receiver of the news.
A meeting can be scheduled through the email without going direct to the boss which may disrupt him or her.
Sending an over due account notice through the mail would be better than to actual go deliver it in person.
The name which is given to the response is to reclaim freedom by doing exactly what we were told we are not allowed to do when someone threatens our freedom is:
According to the given question, we are asked to state the name which is given to the response is to reclaim freedom by doing exactly what we were told we are not allowed to do when someone threatens our freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that there is a will to be free and independent and when a person tries to threaten those freedom, then there is a chance that the people would do what they are not allowed to do in order to reclaim that freedom and this is called reactance.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/19037183
