In Emily Dickinson's 'Hunger' the word itself along with the word food serves as a host of metaphors.
Explanation:
<u>The poem is in 5 stanzas and the 4th stanza represents a turnaround in the narrative of the poem. </u>
It starts with the availability of food that the narrator has never felt before and as they draw the food near they describe the hunger they have faced till then.
In the fourth stanza the rhythm changes as now the narrator starts narrating how being in plenty has also hurt them. That<u> having aplenty is as bad as having none</u> is the running theme that becomes clear here.
Answer:
The sugar has dissolved in the lemonade
Explanation:
Why? Because it is a solution. If you need to sepeate it again put it in a petri dish and set it in the sun
Answer:
B. The ice cream flavor board should be constantly updated.
Explanation:
The main idea of the passage is described in the first line of this paragraph i.e. <em>"The trouble is, of course, that they put up that sign..."</em>. This problem/idea is discussed in next few lines. In the last part of this passage, the writer tells the readers about children's special abilities to identify the flavors just by names, without the signs.
Option A is not correct firstly because the writer has clearly stated the main idea by calling it <em>"the trouble" </em>and secondly the passage is about ice-cream and not about children's abilities.
Option C is incorrect because the passage says nothing deciding on flavor of ice creams.
Option D is incorrect because it is contrary to what is described in the passage. Passage says they don't update signs. Moreover adding new flavors is not result of running out of flavor.
I would say either A because you need evidence for an argumentative essay or C since your going to need to write a rebuttal
