Answer:
Usually, the police tend to respect the rights of citizens and behave according to the rules of their profession, without overreaching and protecting citizens and their rights.
But on some occasions, police officers can overstep their roles and violate some constitutional rights of citizens, whether conscientiously or not.
In the latter case, the police often overstep their duties without the intention of doing so, but as a consequence of the situations to which they are exposed. Thus, for example, more than once a police officer has mistakenly shot a suspect who was in the middle of a persecution operation or at a crime scene, or even many times the police have arrested people who were not committing any crime, just for the simple fact of being suspicious.
Answer:
The guilty but mentally ill
Explanation:
Basically, judges and juries take into an hand that to find a defendant guilty of committing an offense while formally ill/ sick.
(so it proving one guilty but ALSO saying that they understand that the person in the wrong was/is ill or sick.
(i did not copy anything all in my own words)
Have a good day.
-Hailey
Answer: Article VI; Article III Section 2.
Explanation: In Article III Section 2 the Constitution says "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority (...)" we see the power of the judges to all cases under the Constitution.
But, in Article VI, it says: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding", thats the expression of the Supremacy of the Constitution over another rules and the judge's decisions. We can appreciate here the division of powers. In conclution, the propose of constitutional amendments overrule judicial decisions.
Answer:
"Friends of Puyallup"
Explanation:
https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-7-mega-warehouse-proposal-in-the-puyallup-shaw-pioneer-farmland-area/u/25202253
I’m pretty sure the correct and is D, hope this helps:))