1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lena [83]
3 years ago
15

The opening lines of the Mayflower Compact read: “Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian fait

h and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God, and one of another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic…”
This passage best exemplifies which Enlightenment political concept?

Select one:
A. a social contract
B. natural law
C. limited government
D. separation of powers
Law
2 answers:
Virty [35]3 years ago
6 0

This passage best exemplifies the concept of a social contract.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation :</u>

Mayflower Compact was a covenant entered into by the English settlers providing for the rules of self-government when they made their journey to the New World by ship named as Mayflower. This compact was signed by 41 male colonists which included two servants on the 11th November, 1620.

This covenant had laid the cornerstone for the U.S. Constitution. This compact essentially enshrines the theory of social contract which implies that there is either hypothetical or actual contract between the subjects and the ruler and also enumerates the rights as well as duties of every party to the contract.

Llana [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following would an accused be automatically tried by jury?
Leokris [45]

B.. murder...

family want answers, why, how...

motive...

xbfrnd, spouse, b...

consider defense........

8 0
3 years ago
Angela is a prosecutor who handles mostly murder cases. She believes "The CSI Effect" is real and can be problematic for trying
dlinn [17]

With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,

  1. The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
  2. Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>

Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.

As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.

Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.

Learn more about social discrimination here:

brainly.com/question/13964317

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
What was the result in the case of U.S. v. Park, the case in which the defendant, the president of a national food-chain corpora
goblinko [34]

Answer:he is right

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Help me with law please it’s just 1 question
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

High risk

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The LDF attorneys hoped that the arguments set forth in the Boykin v. Alabama brief would eventually become the basis for the de
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna

Explanation:

In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.

By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the best definition of "government”?
    14·1 answer
  • Why rules must be followed.​
    15·2 answers
  • • To what extent is it fair to make a defendant "pay” for the<br> mistakes his lawyer made?
    11·1 answer
  • In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court, what must you do?
    15·1 answer
  • Who serves on a school board?
    13·2 answers
  • 3. When the terms of a written contract are ambiguous and require ________, the courts allow evidence to fill in the gaps.
    13·1 answer
  • The senate is often referred to as ‘The states’ House why ?
    12·1 answer
  • This is to the people who own this app
    10·1 answer
  • C. political leaders
    12·1 answer
  • Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!