Yes, absolutely!
They deserve incarceration as punishment but psychological treatment should not be viewed as a luxury as it is ultimately better for society. The deprivation of their freedoms for extended periods of time is enough. Depending on the severity of the crime, the offender's sentence should match.
Answer: To save her life, i would, but i find that having friends has no impact on who you are and what you want. feeling alone can be a burden, i don't find it right that she would end her life this way, it would be her choice, however if i know i am able to prevent her self inflicted death then my morals would drive me to befriend.
Answer:
Explanation:
Although it has been attempted to overturn the ruling in the Helling case, I would suppose that these attempts have been unsuccessful because the ruling was in favor of a higher standard of care than what was deemed appropriate by for the ophthalmologists. One might argue that the ruling has remained in place because holding the defendants liable was, in a way, a step towards checking the medical profession’s privilege to set it’s own standards. I feel as though legislature has probably not seen fit to reinforce it because the original ruling remains valid in that a doctor can follow all of the standards of care, and still be liable.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i think so i dont study law or so hopefully i helped somehow
