Answer:
That all of to do with the rights of people
Answer: I mean...yeah
Explanation: He shot her and he already had some blame behind it. But to me it seems like his eyes is playing tricks on him for the 3rd sentence.
Answer:
First Degree- The perpetrator intentionally and maliciously kills another human being.
Arson- perpetrator willingly and maliciously sets fire to property the perpetrator carries out
Sedition- the perpetrator carries out large-scale conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States
Manslaughter- the perpetrator kills a person without any malice or intention to kill
Answer:
Crassus's actions were unethical because he asked for payment first and withheld his help in putting out the fire until he received payment.
Explanation:
Marcus Licinius Crassus was a wealthy Roman who made his fortune from the buying of properties from those proscribed by the Sulla. This was done in such a way that, all the properties of the enemies are auctioned off at the cheapest price available.
Also, because of incessant fire outbreaks in Rome, Crassus established a 500 strong fire brigade men who helps in furthering his quest for richness. If a house is burning, those men will rush to the house but would do nothing till Crassus arrives.
He will offer the house owner to but the house at a ridiculous price. If the person accepts, the fire would be put out but if the person rejects, he will allow the whole house to burn to ground.
Explanation: My opinion is below the question.