Direct democracy would be extremely costly because people would have to vote on every single thing and this would cost time and money to ensure everyone has voted. It couldn't be resolved in early times, but maybe with the age of technology, you could surpass that by having everyone vote online or something similar.
Answer:
C plz mark it i am right i remember this
Explanation:
plz mark brainlyest
Tobbaco plantations,sugar ,and trade with france and spain
Based on the fact that Madison was a federalist, the graphic organizer most likely shows his perspective as C.) The national and state governments share some powers.
<h3>What did Madison believe?</h3>
James Madison was of the opinion that the best way to safeguard the unity of the United States was to make for a national government that was quite powerful.
Even at that however, he realized that states still need to have certain powers to enable them to adequately govern their people and their affairs.
As a result, he called for the federal government to share some powers with the state governments in order to ensure the smooth running of the nation. Some of those powers included the power to tax and borrow money.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on concurrent powers at brainly.com/question/847131
#SPJ1
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
