1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dvinal [7]
3 years ago
8

According to the communists why was it important to destroy the 4 olds during the cultural revolution

History
1 answer:
Zepler [3.9K]3 years ago
6 0
Because they interfered with the creation of a modern socialist society
You might be interested in
Reflect on what you have learned about Westward Expansion in the United States. Think about the territories acquired, the trails
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

The acquiring of the territories gave the United States justification to send out immigrants into those territories and settle the land along the trails created by traders and trappers beforehand. These immigrants and other workers then set up the Transcontinental Railroad to facilitate trade and transport back and forth from the west coast to the east.

4 0
4 years ago
Why was Andrew Jackson a president of contradictions?
drek231 [11]

Answer:

Jackson was elected the seventh president of the United States in 1828. Known as the "people's president," Jackson destroyed the Second Bank of the United States, founded the Democratic Party, supported individual liberty and instituted policies that resulted in the forced migration of Native Americans.

Explanation:

Before being elected to the presidency, Jackson gained fame as a general in the United States Army and served in both houses of the U.S. Congress. As president, Jackson sought to advance the rights of the "common man" against a "corrupt aristocracy" and to preserve the Union.

4 0
3 years ago
The right to petition the government was first granted to British subjects (people) in which political document?
irina [24]

Answer:

The Consitiution. Inflamed by the king's stonewalling of their appeals, the Founders embedded the right to petition into the Constitution by way of the First Amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
Pleaseeee help 20 points if you help
Igoryamba

the french bought it from the dutch

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did the Romans get the money to build a new navy? What might this say about the strength of the Roman Republic?
Roman55 [17]

It took two men to wrestle Rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. In the first century BC, Rome was a republic. Power lay in the hands of the Senate, elected by Roman citizens. But the senators were fighting for power between themselves.

'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. ... Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman". In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess.

Many of the achievements of the ancient Romans are still in use today. The Roman Empire was powerful, due to its strong military tactics. Roman military policies helped to expand the empire. The soldiers were trained in the latest tactics of war and were well equipped with the weapons of war.

Who were the top government officials in the Roman Republic and what were their duties? Consuls. There were 2 consuls and they headed the army and ran the government. They also kept each other in line because each could veto the other's decision.

It took two men to wrestle Rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. In the first century BC, Rome was a republic. Power lay in the hands of the Senate, elected by Roman citizens. But the senators were fighting for power between themselves.

Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. ... Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman". In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess.

hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • how did the fugitive slave act and the kansas nebraska act increase tendions between the north and south
    14·1 answer
  • Witch term best disribes a cowboys way of life
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these is a true statement?
    13·2 answers
  • According to both Hinduism and Buddhism ____ .
    9·2 answers
  • What are the reasons for and the effect of the english bill of rights
    10·1 answer
  • English playwright who wrote tragedies and comedies
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following things threaten our fresh water supply?
    15·2 answers
  • HELPPP!!<br><br><br> How did members of President Harding's cabinet prove unfit for<br><br> office?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a loyal<br> Union slave border state?
    13·1 answer
  • How many countries did Adolf Hitler conquer? ​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!