Answer:
is there an image or something idk the vid
<span>(5 + 3i)(8 - 2i) =
40 - 10i + 24i - 6i</span>² =
40 + 14i - 6(-1) =
40 + 14i + 6 =
46 + 14i
Answer:
It took Jen 4 hours to catch up with Laura
Step-by-step explanation:
Gaining speed 45-30= 15 mph
Laura's head start 30×2=60 miles
Time for Jen to catch up 60÷15= 4 hours
In other words
30(t+2)= 45t
30t+60= 45t
60=45t-30t
60= 15t
t=4 hours
Cost per ounce means you take the cost and divide it by the cost:
<span>3.36 / (21/2) </span>
<span>division of fractions changes to the multiplication of the reciprocal: </span>
<span>3.36 * (2 / 21) </span>
<span>3.36 and has 21 as a factor, so let's cancel it: </span>
<span>0.16 * 2 </span>
<span>$0.32 per ounce</span>
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.