1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arsen [322]
3 years ago
5

How did Congress's approach to Reconstruction differ from Presidential Reconstruction under Johnson?

History
2 answers:
Marat540 [252]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Congress gave control of the South to the US military and African Americans gained power.

Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago
5 0

There were full access and control given to the radical republicans over the policy making in Congress reconstruction whereas in presidential reconstruction 10 % rule was to be followed.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • The presidential reconstruction period is around 1865-1867. In this policy, it is said to be that Abraham Lincoln had created the rule with the 10% but before he could put into the act he was assassinated.  
  • The 10% rule says that there can reenter of a  state if 10 % of the voters took the pledge with an oath of commitment to be abiding by emancipation.
  • Congressional reconstruction is called radical reconstruction because the radical republicans have the power in policy drafting and also they favor the forfeited rights rule.  
  • But this plan was to get revenge on the south.

You might be interested in
Discuss the benefits and problems of capitalism and s
Zigmanuir [339]

Capitalism is an economic system in which investments in an ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private  individuals or corporations specially as contrasted to cooperatively state-owned means of wealth. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

<h2>Why do people say that capitalism works better than socialism?</h2>

Capitalism and socialism have both been put to the test. Socialism never works; capitalism occasionally does. The outcomes are self-evident.

  • China. After the cultural revolution, the communist party seized power in China. They didn't have much financial success with anything. In its place, starvation claimed the lives of millions. Capitalist policies were put into place when Moa Zedong left office, and economic development suddenly skyrocketed.
  • US versus USSR The huge ideological conflict between capitalism and socialism was eventually the cause of the cold war. The sides began on land that was largely level. There is no doubt who won. The USA is currently the world's most powerful country by a wide margin. There is no longer a Soviet Union.
  • Almost all affluent countries, including the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, and even the Nordic countries, have capitalist systems. All have different amounts of social expenditure, but this is only sustained by the underlying capitalism.
  • Cuba. Cubans are all equal, yet they are all equally impoverished. Nearly everyone in Cuba has it better than even those who are regarded as impoverished in prosperous countries like the USA.
  • Venezuela. elected a communist administration. They are currently in financial ruin. It would be difficult to locate a socialist administration that has made any effort to better the lives of its citizens. Although I would think there are none at all, perhaps I haven't looked closely enough.

In conclusion, a basic misunderstanding of human nature is the basis of socialism. When everyone actually ends up doing is trying to piggyback off of everyone else's hard work, it makes the false assumption that everyone is willing to labor selflessly for the benefit of the group. Although it is not a flawless system, capitalism at least provides a reward for effort. And when it comes down to it, hard effort is what improves our lives.

<h2>What are the pros and cons of socialism and capitalism?</h2>

Capitalism:

Pros ⇒ It is a method of voluntary trade. It is the best at allocating scarce resources. It has given people the highest quality of life in human history. Property rights, arbitrary assessments, and free will are all protected. It best manages self-interest. It rewards people who make the world a better place by making them rich. Static economic classes are eliminated by capitalism's dynamic character. Of course, there is more.

Cons ⇒ There isn't a spokesperson for free market capitalism. Market manipulation, monopolies, oligopolies, cronyism, fascism, inflation, central banking, fractional reserve banking, and any other financial news-related scheme are all confused with it.

Socialism:

Pro ⇒ Fair distribution of total generated wealth

Cons ⇒ It is oppressive. The loss of private property in the means of production prevents accurate economic calculations. Rare resources are squandered since there aren't genuine prices (actual prices reflect consumer values) (mountains of Soviet concrete). It does not satisfy the insatiable human drive for more (demand). denies possessing oneself. It establishes two static classes, one for workers and the other for politicians. Marx demanded that "undesirables" be removed from society (Irish, Scottish and non-whites).  

8 0
2 years ago
The Articles of Confederation established a representative government. Which answer best explains how it worked? (5 points) a Ev
agasfer [191]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!!!!!!!!!!<br> PLEASE
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

D, helped France fight it's own revolutions

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz plz asap hury plz hury plz
Arte-miy333 [17]
Alexander the Great is the answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did pennsylvania have the most signers to the constitution
matrenka [14]

Answer:

Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. ... First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office.

Explanation:

i hope it's help...

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who did Thomas Jefferson accused of tyranny in the Declaration of Independence
    10·1 answer
  • What is likely to result from the event referred to in the headine?
    8·2 answers
  • A slave-trade cycle initiated by ship-owners was known as:
    10·2 answers
  • To sell goods in China American Business Leaders needed
    12·2 answers
  • The main form of west Africa government was
    14·1 answer
  • Who wrote 1500 plays including “The Sheep Well”
    8·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it important to prepare for a Hurricane?
    9·1 answer
  • 2 razones por la que la población de Mumbia está aumentando rápidamente.​
    10·1 answer
  • HURRY PLEASEEEEE
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!