The answer is D because if u were in a flood it would mess up ur car
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a.
Contribution per unit
= Selling price per unit - Variable costs per unit
= $300 - $200
= $100 per unit
Now
Break even point (units)
= Fixed costs ÷ Contribution margin per unit
= $14,000,000 ÷ $100
= 140,000 units
And,
b)
Sales units required for a target profit of $1,400,000
So,
= (Fixed costs + Target profits) ÷ Contribution margin per unit
= ($14,000,000 + $1,400,000) ÷ $100
= 154,000 units
This demonstrates a difficulty in crafting a global communication strategy.
The question says that the nation of China is very much controlling the media in the country. This has made it difficult for businesses to communicate with their users.
This here tells us about the issue of communication. The companies may have issues sending message across to all of its customers due to the media problem.
This problem may be more difficult in a case where the business is a foreign market.
Read more on brainly.com/question/15696678?referrer=searchResults
In an automobile manufacturing plant, the assembly-line workers are considered to be direct labor cost.
<h3>Direct labor cost</h3>
Direct labor cost is wages that are incurred in order to produce goods or provide services to customers. The total amount of direct labor cost is much more than wages paid. It is assigned to a particular work order, or provision of a service.
It also includes the payroll taxes associated with those wages, plus the cost of company-paid medical insurance, life insurance.
Find out more on direct labor cost at: brainly.com/question/13050471
Game theory suggests that competing firms in an oligopolistic industry may be reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will match price cuts but ignore price increases.
<h3>What is Game theory?</h3>
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing. Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
Here are the options:
. too quick to raise prices because they will fail to anticipate that rivals may gain market shares.
b. reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will match price cuts but ignore price increases
c. reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will ignore price cuts but match price increases
d. too quick to cut prices because they fail to anticipate that rivals may also cut their prices.
To learn more about game theory, please check: brainly.com/question/25746243
