It is extremely important for a leader to be able to deal with cultural aspects and to be able to better understand how certain cultures work.
The culture of a nation, society or region has considerable relevance to the culture of organizations and, consequently, much of the success or failure of organizational programs and management method implementations may be associated with disregard of national traits.
Denying the fact may induce the individual (professional, researcher or scholar) to biased conclusions. By no means should the traits be given full importance, but disregarding them can be a mistake.
Thus, organizations are social institutions that have their history and develop their own culture, but considered part of a broader context of national culture.
The term cultural intelligence to determine this ability to interpret the foundations of cultural interactions, the development of attentive posture to these interactions, and the ability to adapt to different intercultural situations, while avoiding turning on 'autopilot'.
Answer:
Overmier and Seligman have described the phenomenon of learned <u>helplessness</u> as the tendency to feel powerless in the face of events that we can't control.
In 1967, Overmier and Seligman conducted a research, which showed that dogs, once found in an uncontrollable situation such as unavoidable electric shocks, were incapable of escaping a different situation, although there was a possible escape in that situation. The phenomenon of learned helplessness is also commonly experienced by humans who, after repeatedly going through a stressful situation, believe they do not have control over the events. They fail to take any action, even if there is a possible solution.
Answer:
Good jobs in rural areas, more clean energy, fighting deforestation and climate change, tax revenue and payments to developing countries. These are some examples of the various development impacts that are generated by the companies Finnfund finances
Explanation:
<em><u>please</u></em><em><u> mark</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u> as</u></em><em><u> brilliant</u></em><em><u> answer</u></em><em><u> please</u></em>
<span>Answer: persons consumption of the good does not leave less for others to consume ( non rivulrouse consumption)
2 joint consumption- we can all consume at the same time
3 consumers strategically do not pay producers for their output because of chronic free riding.
4 once it is produced it is not economically viable to exlude the free rider.</span>