'Actual Tigers Company'
Total Assets
$100,000
Stockholder Equity: $30,000
$100,000 - $30,000 = $70,000
$70,000 + $30,000 = $100,000
Total Assets - Equity = $70,000 (total liabilities)
$70,000 + Equity = $100,000 (total assets)
In accounting if we minus the total assets ($100,000) with equity ($30,000) it will always give the "total liabilities" which is (70,000)
Then, adding the "total liabilities" ($70,000) with the equity ($30,000) equals $100,000 equal like as the "total assets"of $100,000
The total assets MUST match the total liabilities. If they don't match then either the calculation of the total assets are inaccurate or the numbers are estimated wrong to recalculate.
Answer: a. Issues
Explanation:
A Communication plan for a project allows for easier information flow between the stakeholders in the project including the client, the company and the workers.
By setting standards on how and what should be communicated the plan will let the stakeholders know how to communicate any issues affecting the project. The plan will also let the stakeholders know how to track issues that will be reported.
Answer: Compound interest pays interest on the principal and the interest earned in each period.
Explanation:edge 2020
Answer: $5,000
Explanation:
Per the requirements of qualified plans that permit loans, the maximum amount that an individual can withdraw is whichever is lesser between $50,000 and 50% of their Vested Account Balance.
Vance in this scenario has a vested account balance of $40,000.
50% of that would be $20,000.
That means that he can be loaned $20,000. However, he already has an outstanding loan balance that must be accounted for of 15,000.
Subtracting those figures we have,
= 20,000 - 15,000
= $5,000
The maximum loan that Vance can take from the qualified plan is $5,000
Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.
