Answer: 2 years
Explanation:
Years of existing of the firm=30 years
Number of associates= 300,
Number of Managers= 70;
Number of partners= 30;
Total number of workers=400
Number of years associates has been changed in last 30 year=30/5=6
Number of years managers has been changed in last 30 year=30/3=10
Number of times for partner=x
Number of years partners has been changed in last 30 year=30/x=15
15x=30
x=30/2
x=2 years
Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation:
Answer:
New Beta = 1,17
Explanation:
Portfolio # Beta NEW Beta
$ 5.000 1 1,00 2,00
$ 5.000 2 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 3 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 4 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 5 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 6 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 7 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 8 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 9 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 10 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 11 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 12 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 13 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 14 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 15 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 16 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 17 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 18 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 19 1,12 1,12
$ 5.000 20 1,24 1,24
$ 100.000 1,12 1,17
It’s D and goodluckkkkkkk