Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
<span>The Supreme court declared the northwest ordinance constitutional, meaning that the lands promised to natives by the US would be given to them. That being said, the land was very soon after, taken back when Americans expressed anger over the fact that they couldn't have that land.</span>
Answer: Tigris and Euphrates
Explanation:
Mesopotamia. Mesopotamia was the earliest river valley civilization, starting to form around 3500 BC. The civilization was created after regular trading started relationships between multiple cities and states around the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Mesopotamian cities became self-run civil governments.
Answer:
i think E) Was the Broadway musical west side story.
<span>The cities of Chichen Itza and Tenochtitlan reveal that the civilization that founded them have advanced knowledge in architecture, mathematics, physics, chemistry and astronomy at the very least.
To create such proportional and seemless structures, civilization must have advanced mathematics in practice. And for those structures to stand not only the test of time but also the forces of nature requires specialized knowledge in both chemistry and physics. This leads to the conclusion that the people who planned the structures are not only priests or shamans but also engineers who like their modern counterparts are well versed in the sciences.
</span>
