Answer:
D. mass feeder
Explanation:
A) suspension feeder
B) fluid feeder
C) deposit feeder
D) mass feeder
<em>Suspension feeder requires capturing of food that are suspended in water through the use of specialized organs.</em>
<em>Fluid feeding involves feeding on liquid (such as blood) emanating from other organisms.</em>
<em>Deposit feeding involves feeding on sediments</em>
<em>Mass feeding involves ingestion of scraps of different food materials.</em>
Hence, the correct option is D.
The complete question is:
If these organisms were arraigned in a food pyramid, which organism would have the least amount of total energy available?
- Producers
- Carnivore
- Herbivores
- Top predators
Answer: Top predators
Explanation:
The top predators get the least energy because according to the 10 per cent law the energy transfer only 10 energy is transferred to the next successive level.
The next level of the organism receives only 10 of the total energy that the previous level has.
Hence, the top predators have the least amount of energy in it as the energy is transferred through various levels before reaching top predators.
We can confirm that the reintroduction of the wolf to the ecosystem would most likely cause a decline in the population of coyotes.
<h3>Why would this cause a decline in the population of coyotes?</h3>
The wolf, in most ecosystems, is considered to be the top predator. This means that it will also hunt and consume the coyotes. This alone would cause a decline in the coyote population as they now have an additional predator hunting them. Also, the wolves would be competing with the coyotes for food sources, furthering the impact on the coyote population.
Therefore, we can confirm that the reintroduction of the wolf to the ecosystem would most likely cause a decline in the population of coyotes.
To learn more about ecosystems visit:
brainly.com/question/1673533?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Answer: increase
Explanation:
it has increased every Superbowl they have the population of the crowd gets bigger and bigger every year. yes it has grown at a constant rate of change?
