Answer:
(C) A Type I error would be incorrectly failing to convict the defendant when he is guilty. A Type II error would be incorrectly convicting the defendant when he is innocent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Type I error is rejecting the true null hypothesis and type II error is not rejecting the false null hypothesis. Hence in this scenario, it will be:
A Type I error would be incorrectly convicting the defendant when he is innocent. A Type II error would be incorrectly failing to convict the defendant when he is guilty.
Option C is correct.
A rational number is written in the form p/q, where p and q are not integers and q is not equal to 0.
An irrational number can be written in decimal form and possibly no end. In simple words, an irrational number cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Answer: y = 4/3x -8
Step-by-step explanation:
(6,0) (0,-8)
0-(-8)/6-0 = 8/6 = 4/3
y intercept is given already
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did it and got it right
No because the amount of zeros at the end of both numbers is the amount of zeros that's going to be in the product