Janet is <u>a "whistleblower".</u>
A whistleblower is a person, who could be a representative of an organization, or an administration office, unveiling data to people in general or some higher expert about any bad behavior, which could be as extortion, debasement, and so on.
An whistleblower could be a representative, temporary worker, or a provider who winds up mindful of any unlawful exercises.
To shield whistleblower from losing their activity or getting abused there are particular laws. Most organizations have a different arrangement which obviously states how to report such an occurrence.
Answer:
$13,717
Explanation:
The amount of AMTI is ($100,000+$30,000) $130,000.
AMT base
= $130,000 - $83,400
=$46,600.
TMT is $46,600 × .26 = $12,116.
Their tax liability which is $13,717 is greater of the TMT or regular tax which is $12,116.
Hence , the amount of their total tax liability in this case is $13,717
Answer:
Total interest paid = $606.63
Explanation:
First calculate the monthly payment for first six months
Monthly interest for first 6 months =.006/12=.0005
= 6500*(1.0005)^6
=6519.52
Interest rate for next six months
=17.37%/12=1.45%
(1.0145)^6=1.090054
=6519.52*(1+.0145)^6
=7106.63
Total interest paid = 7106.63-6500
Total interest paid = 606.63
Answer:
Explanation:
Overhead allocated to Product X = Department A overhead cost+ Department B overhead cost
= $51,157.84+$5755.62=
= $56,913
Calculations:
Using a single-driver allocation system, with direct labor hours as the driver, how much overhead was allocated to Product X:
Department A's Overhead rate per labor hour = Overhead costs/Total direct labor hours = $4300000/60000 hours = $71.66 per hour
Overhead (Department A) = $71.66per hour*724 labor hours
= $51,157.84
Department B's Overhead rate per labor hour = Overhead costs/Total direct labor hours = $2200000/60000 hours = $36.66 per hour
Overhead (Department A) = $36.66 per hour*157 labor hours
= $5755.62
Answer:
The yields with each alternative from 1-4 are as follows:
Alternative 1 189.63
Alternative 2 199.72
Alternative 3 199.58
Alternative 4 195.56
Since each alternative costs $15,000 ,the most cost-effective alternative is that which produces the highest output with the same cost of $15000
In other words, the most cost effective is alternative 2 with 199.72 output.
Find detailed computations in the attached spreadsheet.
Explanation:
In calculating the output in each case , the formula is:
Input*multiples of stages percentages.For instance in calculating the output for alternative 1 ,I have this:300*(89%*91%*94%*93%*93%*96%)=189.63