They can override it with a 2/3 vote in both the House and senate, so it’ll be false.
Answer:
D. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not
Explanation:
The genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda are part of the numerous genocides that took place in the past several decades. The genocide in Bosnia was initiated by Serbian nationalist, and it was toward the Muslims and the Croatians. The international community did reacted though to stop it, and sent its military forces in order to put things under control. The genocide in Rwanda though took another course. The Hutu started to perform genocide over the Tutsi minority, but the international community was hesitating should it react or not, if it does in which way, and while it was thinking the genocide was going on and on. Luckily for the Tutsi people, they had their own military forces that were well equipped, so they managed to stop the aggression form the Hutu before they made a full scale genocide.
Has to be approved by 2/3 of the congress.
The My Lai massacre changed public perception of Vietnam drastically. Many people already thought it was an unjust war, and this added to that anti-war sentiment. When many veterans came home they were treated like trash, because everyone back home saw the terrible war crimes committed by the U.S. Many people called for an end to Vietnam after it.
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
