I'll give you some thoughts on the political views of the thinkers named. It's up to you to search for images and write your descriptions.
Aristotle believed there were three valid types of government, depending on the size and scope of what was to be governed or upon local situations. (He studied the constitutions of various governments as part of his work in writing <em />his work, <em>Politics.</em>) As state with a sole ruler ruling rightly is a monarchy. If that form of state is abused, it becomes tyranny. A state with a number of members of the ruling class is an aristocracy -- rule by the excellent ones, noble men suited for governing. If it is corrupted by having a few rule but not of noble character or in a noble way, Aristotle referred to that as an oligarchy (rule by a few). A state in which all worthy men participate in governing Aristotle termed a polity, a constitutional government. He saw it as a corruption, though, to have a full democracy (rule by the people), which would become the sort of thing we call mob rule.
Aquinas picked up thoughts from Aristotle, who had favored a monarchy. Aquinas, writing from a Christian perspective, wrote about the righteous and proper sort of ruler who would serve as God's appointed leader among the people, truly caring for them (not becoming a tyrant).
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx were partners in establishing communism as a political ideology. Engels and Marx believed that in time, class struggles between overlords and those beneath them would give way to a society in which all ruled and lived and worked collectively.
Answer:
Option: A. Shah Abbas.
Explanation:
The Safavid Dynasty arose at the beginning of the 16th century. Shāh Abbās brought the Safavid Empire to the height. He was able to do this by introducing a central government organised by administrators to run the empire. He extended his army after the Ottoman Empire's janizaries by using the latest weapons. He also encouraged the growth of trade and industry and decreased taxes on herders and farmers.
The answer would be a) investors purchased the stock with little cash down; if the price dropped the investor had to repay.
Answer:
The answer is E
Explanation:
the reason why it's it is because some states in the United States of America has been gay Liberty and they sometimes don't accept it .
B) "The U.S. movement became divided over issues of racial equality, while the British movement did not" statement is best describes a key difference between women’s suffrage movements in the United States and Great Britain. Women's suffrage movement in the United States resulting in The American Equal Rights Association (AERA). This Association was formed to secure equal right to all American citizen. But there was an amendment proposal to deny the suffrage because of racial reason. This made the Women's suffrage movement in the United Stated had split.
