The American businesses have been favoring the overseas expansion of the USA because it was in their interest to make more profit.
The overseas expansion of USA meant that bigger market was going to open for the products and goods for the American businesses. Also, they were going to be able to create affiliations in those new territories, which was very desirable because the labor force was much more cheaper but had pretty much the same efficiency.
Also, apart from the opening of the new markets in the gained territories, the businesses, through their affiliations were going to be much closer to the other big markets, thus minimizing the coast for transportation. All of these things were going to make much bigger profit tot he American businesses, so they were very fond of such a move.
Have you ever heard about Louis and Clark and Sacagawea? Anywho after the territory was bought from France Jefferson, the president at the time, sent a group of men to explore the territory. They were led by Louis and Clark, they met an Indian tribe and an Indian woman helped them on their journey.
Ok so sorry to give this app to my mom but
T<span>he term “supply-side economics” is used in two different but related ways. Some use the term to refer to the fact that production (supply) underlies consumption and living standards. In the long run, our income levels reflect our ability to produce goods and services that people value. Higher income levels and living standards cannot be achieved without expansion in output. Virtually all economists accept this proposition and therefore are “supply siders.”</span>
Secretary of state is your answer